24
What is the point made in paragraphs 1 and 2?

People demonstrating against the world’s evils are quite sincere in their convictions.

People should heed warnings that humanity may be destroying itself.

The survival of mankind is not served by people who invite ridicule.
‘Worse, it removes its teeth first.’ (paragraph 4)
25
What does this refer to?

BP lured Greenpeace into an agreement in order to reveal Greenpeace’s basic lack of
staying power.

BP offered a settlement to Greenpeace in order to reduce the publicity value of the
Greenpeace action.

BP promised not to bankrupt Greenpeace on the condition that the Greenpeace action
got no media attention.

BP withdrew from the scene of action in order to put the oil company back in the media’s
favour.
27
What was Margaret Thatcher concerned about, according to paragraph 6?

The availability of the world’s natural resources leading to an ever-increasing level of
consumption.

The explosion of the world population in view of the earth’s natural resources being
exhausted.

The world’s natural resources rapidly being converted into a serious environmental
problem.
28
Why does the writer mention McDonald’s suing for libel (paragraph 8)?
To illustrate that

against a powerful business adversary, environmentally-minded civilians stand little
chance of winning a court case.

court cases involving environmental damage may affect a company negatively, regardless
of the verdict.

multinationals are always on their guard against gaining the reputation of being
environmentally unfriendly.

only scientifically based arguments stand up in cases where a company is accused of
polluting the environment.
29
What can be concluded from paragraph 9?
Direct-action campaigns

are justified as a means of exercising control over business corporations.

should be targeted at governments for their reluctance to limit the influence of big
business.

tend to be overestimated with regard to their immediate impact on business policies.
31
How can paragraphs 13–15 be summarised?

A joint effort of business and government institutions is needed to counter the present
wave of protest actions.

Corporations are adopting effective strategies to obstruct forms of unwelcome criticism.

The world of business is exercising increasing pressure to get new legislation on protest
campaigns.

Ultimately it is a government’s responsibility to control demonstrations and other protest
campaigns.